wedding dresses swimsuit

Statistical  Analysis

TABLE  1  LITERACY  STATUS  BY  AREA
Click here to view graph

AREA FUNCTIONALLY LITERATE FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE ILLITERATE TOTAL % BY AREA
   NO. %  NO. %  NO. %  NO. %
NORTH WEST 204 77.0 49 18.5 12 4.5 265 14.2
NORTH EAST 502 80.3 82 13.1 41 6.6 625 33.5
CENTRAL 204 71.8 50 17.6 30 10.6 284 15.2
SOUTH 409 77.6 62 11.8 55 10.4 527 28.2
TOBAGO 126 75.4 30 18.0 11 6.6 167 8.9
 TOTAL 1445 77.4 273 14.6 149 8.0 1868 100.0

Analysis of the data by area clearly shows that illiteracy is greater in the Central region and in the South at 10%.  The North East, which includes most of the East West corridor, showed the highest rate of literacy (80.3%) with the North West, or Capital region close behind.  The literacy rate for Tobago was slightly lower at 75% but with less illiteracy also, 18% falling in the middle group (functionally illiterate).

Both illiteracy and functional illiteracy were higher in rural areas. 10% of those living in rural areas were illiterate and 15.5% were functionally illiterate. Even more significantly, of those found to be illiterate, 65.1% live in rural areas while 53.5% of those who are functionally illiterate, also live in rural areas. 

The fact that 46.5% of the functionally illiterate are in urban areas is due to the high levels of functional illiteracy in low income urban areas.

Overall, literacy in urban areas was somewhat higher than the national  average at 80.6% while rural areas were lower at 74.1%.

TABLE 2    LITERACY  STATUS  BY  AGE  GROUP  (YEARS)
Click here to view graph

LITERACY STATUS 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-60 61 + TOTAL
  NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. %
FUNCTIONALLY LITERATE 439 88.5 329 80.8 293 83.0 244 67.8 138 56.3 1443 77.4
FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE 45 9.0 58 14.2 48 13.6 73 20.3 49 20.0 273 14.6
ILLITERATE 14 2.8 20 4.9 12 3.4 43 11.9 58 23.7 147 8.0
TOTAL 498 100.0 407 100.0 353 100.0 360 100.0 245 100.0 1863 100.0
ROWS %   26.7   21.8   18.9   19.3   13.2   100.0

The proportion of literacy was markedly lower for the older age groups, as may be expected as fewer educational opportunities were available in their young days.  A similar trend was apparent throughout the table.  For the age groups from 15 to 44 years literacy rates ranged from almost 90% to 82%.  From age 45 rates were much lower.  When the youngest of these people were aged 15 in 1964 there were only limited facilities for secondary education.  This can also be seen from the table on highest level of schooling. 

TABLE 3    LITERACY  STATUS  BY  YEARS  OF  SCHOOLING
Click here to view graph

LITERACY STATUS NONE < 3 YRS 4-6 YRS 7-8 YRS 9-10 YRS 10+ TOTAL
  NO % NO % NO % NO % NO % NO % NO %
FUNCTIONALLY LITERATE 11 45.8 3 4.0 88 48.9 235 70.4 227 79.2 881 91.1 1445 77.4
FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE 3 12.5 17 22.7 61 33.9 72 21.6 48  16.7 72 7.5 273 14.6
ILLITERATE   10 41.7 55 73.3 31 17.2 27 8.1 12 4.2  14 1.4  149 8.0
TOTAL 24 100.0 75 100.0 180 100.0 334 100.0 287 100.0 967 100.0 1867 100.0
ROW %   1.3   4.0    9.6   17.9   15.4   51.8   100.0

The number of years schooling received was a major factor in determining the degree of literacy.  Thus, of those with 9 or more years schooling - a full course - only 2.1% remained illiterate and 88.3% were literate (with 9.6% semi-literate).  This contrasts sharply with the group  which had only 3 years or less schooling, which recorded 65.7% as illiterate, 20.2% as still functionally illiterate, with only 14.1% actually literate.  The groups with 4-6 and 7-8 yrs schooling show expected rates between the extremes of the range, with 49% literacy for 4-6 years and 70% for 7-8yrs

TABLE 4  LITERACY  STATUS  BY  TYPE  OF  SCHOOL  LAST  ATTENDED
Click here to view graph

LITERARY STATUS NONE PRIMARY JR. SEC. SR. SEC 5-7 YEAR SEC. VOC./TECH. UNIVER- SITY OTHER TOTAL
  NO % NO % NO % NO % NO % NO % NO % NO % NO %
FUNCTIONALLY LITERATE 2   5.1 436 62.4 40 80.0 338 91.8 322 88.5 193 92.3 60 95.2 54 72.0 1445 77.4
FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE 4 10.3 173 24.7 7 14.0 24 6.5 36 9.9 16  7.7 3 4.8 10 13.3 273 14.6
ILLITERATE 33 84.6 90 12.9 3 6.0 6 1.6 6 1.6         11 14.7 149  8.0
TOTAL 39 100.0 699 100.0 50 100.0 368 100.0 364 100.0 209 100.0 63 100.0 75 100.0 1867 100.0
ROW %   2.1   37.4   2.7   19.7   19.5   11.2   3.4   4.0   100.0

According to the last type of school attended, literacy rates ranged from a low of 5.1% for no schooling to 95.2% for the few who attended University.  For those whose highest level was Primary school  62.4% were literate and 13% remained illiterate with 25% recorded in the functionally illiterate group.  Those who attended Junior Secondary achieved 80% literacy and only 6.0% were completely illiterate For the regular Secondary and Senior Secondary the rates were 88-92% literate and just under 2% illiterate.

TABLE 5  LITERACY  STATUS  BY  GENDER
Click here to view graph

LITERACY STATUS MALE FEMALE TOTAL
  NO. % NO. % NO. %
FUNCTIONALLY LITERATE 596 76.9 845 77.8 1441 77.4
FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE 121 15.6 150 13.8 271 14.6
ILLITERATE 58 7.5 91 8.4 149 8.0
TOTAL 775 100.0 1086 100.0 1861 100.0
ROW %   41.8   58.2   100.0

From a total survey population of 1868 (less 7 in the not stated category) an effective sample of 1861 was analysed with 1086 women and 775 men.  The functionally literate group comprised 77.4% of this number.  The functionally illiterate 14.6% and that part of the population which was completely illiterate was 8.0%.  Illiteracy among women was slightly higher than among men, with 8.4% of women counted as illiterate compared with 7.5% for men.  Similarly the functionally illiterate averaged 14.6%, with 13.8% recorded for women and 15.6% for men. For the functionally literate group, slightly more women than men were recorded as literate (77.8%) with 76.9% for men.

 In all regions, except the North West, in the older age groups (45+) there were noticeably higher rates of illiteracy among women compared to men. Thus in Central, of females aged 61 and over, 54% were illiterate compared to 38% of males in the same age group. Different internal migration patterns may explain why women in the North West were rather more literate. Central Statistical Office figures show  that more women than men migrate to urban areas within Trinidad.

 Among the younger age group, in every region and particularly in the Central area, rates of literacy for women were higher and showed more improvement than for men.  Thus, in Central in the age group 15-24, 91% of the females were literate as compared  to 83% of the males. This suggests that women, starting from lower levels, are catching up rapidly.

TABLE 6   LITERACY  STATUS  BY  ETHNICITY
Click here to view graph
     ( Note: Please scroll the pop up window to view graphs for each Ethnicity)

LITERACY STATUS AFRICAN EAST INDIAN MIXED /OTHER TOTAL
  NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. %

FUNCTIONALLY
LITERATE

637  78.3 580  73.7  227  86.0 1444 77.4
FUNCTIONALLY
ILLITERATE
134  16.5 114  14.5   23   8.7 271 14.6
ILLITERATE   42   5.2   93  11.8   14   5.3 149 8.0
TOTAL 813 100.0 787 100.0 264 100.0 1864 100.0
ROWS %   43.7   58.2   14.1   100.0

Analysing by ethnicity, the survey included 43.7% of Africans and 42.2% people of East Indian origin, with a further 14.1% of the respondents being of the mixed or other category.  The percentage of literacy was highest among this last group, at 86%.  The African group showed a rate of functional literacy of 78.3% whereas the East Indian group had a rate of 73.7% - somewhat lower.  For the functionally illiterate category, the Africans had 16.5% and East Indians 14.5% with mixed/other at 8.7%.

The percentage of illiteracy was markedly higher among the East Indians at 11.8% compared to 5.2% and 5.3% for Africans and Mixed.  The average rate of illiteracy was 8.0%.  These findings may be explained by other factors such as age, area of residence and years of schooling.

TABLE  7    LITERACY  STATUS  BY  RELIGION
Click here to view graph

RELIGION

FUNCTIONALLY
LITERATE

FUNCTIONALLY
ILLITERATE

ILLITERATE

TOTAL

   NO.

%

NO.

%

NO.

%

NO.

%

ANGLICAN

  142

80.2

  30

16.9

   5

   3.4

 177

   9.6

BAPTIST

    83

73.5

  21

18.6

   9

   8.0

 113

   6.0

HINDU

  344

68.8

  83

16.6

 73

 14.6

 500

 26.9

MUSLIM

    56

80.0

   8

11.4

   6

   8.6

   70

   3.7

PENTECOSTAL

  125

87.4

  10

  7.0

   8

   5.6

 143

   7.7

PRESBYTERIAN

    58

74.4

  12

15.4

   8

 10.3

   78

   4.2

R. CATHOLIC

  415

81.5

  67

13.2

 27

   5.3

 509

  27.4

NONE

    21

77.8

   5

18.5

   1

   3.7

   27

   1.4

OTHER

  198

81.2

  34

13.9

 12

   4.9

 244

  13.1

TOTAL

               

ROWS %

1442

77.4

270

14.6

149

   8.0

1861

100.0

Illiteracy was found to be noticeably higher amongst Hindus, 14.6% compared to an average of 8.0% for all groups.  The next highest proportion was Presbyterian at 10.3%.  The lowest illiteracy rates recorded were for Anglicans, Roman Catholics and those who gave no religion.  The low rate of 5.6% among Pentecostals was also significant.  Muslims and Baptists rated at the 8.0% average.  These results may be due to the overwhelming effect of location (in rural/underdeveloped areas).  Generally, 77.4% of the total population was functionally literate.  Among the different religious groups, the Anglicans, Muslims and Roman Catholics reached a rate of 80.0% as did the residual ‘other’ group.  The Pentecostals attained 87.4% literacy - the highest rate.

 TABLE  8   LITERACY  STATUS  BY  WORK  STATUS
Click here to view graph - Literacy Status - Employed
Click here to view graph - Literacy Status - Unemployed
Click here to view graph - Literacy Status - Keeping House
Click here to view graph - Literacy Status - Other/Training

LITERACY STATUS

WORKING

UNEMPLOYED

KEEPING HOUSE

OTHER

TOTAL

NO.

%

NO.

%

NO.

%

NO.

%

NO.

%

FUNCTIONALLY LITERATE

655

 82.6

253

  76.0

372

  71.4

182

 80.5

1462

 78.0

FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE

 97

 12.2

  61

  18.3

  88

  16.9

  25

 11.1

  271

 14.5

ILLITERATE

 41

  5.2

  19

    5.7

  61

  11.7

  19

   8.4

  140

   7.5
TOTAL 793 100.0   75 100.0 180 100.0 334 100.0 1867 100.0

ROW  %

  42.3   17.8

  27.8     12.1   100.0

The working population showed a higher rate of literacy than the unemployed or those keeping house.  This last category showed the highest rate of illiteracy at 11.7% - well above the average 8.0%.

TABLE  9    LITERACY  STATUS  BY  INDUSTRY
Click here to view graph

INDUSTRY

FUNCTIONALLY LITERATE

FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE

ILLITERATE

TOTAL

NO.

%

NO.

%

NO.

%

NO.

%

COL%

AGRICULTURE

  52

  67.0

  14

18.0

12

15.4

  78

100.0

  9.8

OIL & MINES

  18

100.0

-

  0.0

-

  0.0

  18

100.0

  2.3

CONSTRUCTION

  40

  75.5

   8

15.1

 5

  9.4

  53

100.0

  6.7

SERVICE/TOURISM

142

  80.7

 21

11.9

13

  7.4

176

100.0

22.2

RETAIL

  69

  82.1

 12

14.3

  3

  3.6

  84

100.0

10.6

GOV’T BANK & FINANCE

124

  84.4

 20

13.6

  3

  2.0

147

100.0

18.5

MANUFACTURING

  67

  87.0

   9

11.7

  1

  1.3

  77

100.0

  9.7

UTILITIES & COMMUNICATIONS

  43

  93.5

   2

  4.3

  1

  2.2

  46

100.0

  5.8

EDUCATION & RESEARCH

  40

100.0

-

  0.0

-

  0.0

  40

100.0

  5.0

MEDICAL

  25

  92.6

   1

  3.7

  1

  3.7

  27

100.0

  3.4

OTHER

  38

  80.8

   9

19.1

-

  0.0

  47

100.0

  5.9

TOTAL

658

  83.0

 96

12.1

39

  4.9

793

100.0

  5.9

Generally, the employed were more literate than the unemployed, but within the employed, the rates of literacy varied considerably between industries in which the respondents worked. Agriculture had the lowest literacy rate at 67%. Similarly, just 75% of those working in construction were functionally literate whereas manufacturing had 87% literacy. Of the workers in Government and banking, 84.4% were rated literate and 2.0% illiterate. The industries where no illiteracy or functional illiteracy were found were education, research and the oil industry.

 TABLE 10     LITERACY  STATUS  BY  OCCUPATION
Click here to view graph

MANUAL/
TRADESMAN

SERVICE
WORKER

SELF-EMPLOYED

PROTECTIVE
SERVICES

CLERICAL/
SALES

PROF/ ADMIN

NO

%

NO

%

NO

%

NO

%

NO

%

NO

%

FUNCTIONALLY LITERATE

 180

 77.6

123

  79.9

 28

  80.0

  33

 86.8

  129

    87.8

  99

 90.0

FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE

   33

 14.2

  21

  13.6

  5

  14.3

    3

   7.9

    15

   10.2

   9

   8.2

ILLITERATE

   19

   8.2

  10

    6.5

  2

    5.7

    2

   5.3

     3

     2.0

   2

   1.8

TOTAL

 232

100.0

154

100.0

35

100.0

  38

100.0

  147

 100.0

110

100.0

Generally, the employed were more literate than the unemployed, but within the employed those in certain industries showed lower literacy rates. Of those who were employed, functional literacy was lowest among manual workers and tradesman at 77.6%. This group also had the highest illiteracy at 8.2%. Literacy among service workers and the self-employed was slightly higher, 79.9% and 80% respectively. Those with professional or administrative jobs had the highest proportion of functionally literate persons, (90%), closely followed by clerical/sales personnel, (87.8).
 

Return to Previous Page